RESOLUTION NO. 70-13
Mrs. Alexander offered the following resolution and moved its adoption, seconded by Mr.Holgate.
RESOLUTION OPPOSING THE PROCESS FOR ENACTMENT OF THE NEW YORK SECURE AMMUNITION AND FIREARMS ENFORCEMENT ACT OF 2013
RESOLUTION NO. 70-13
Mrs. Alexander offered the following resolution and moved its adoption, seconded by Mr.Holgate.
RESOLUTION OPPOSING THE PROCESS FOR ENACTMENT OF THE NEW YORK SECURE AMMUNITION AND FIREARMS ENFORCEMENT ACT OF 2013
Passed on February 11th 2013
Town Of Hoosick Resolution opposing the NY SAFE act by Evan Hempel
#7 SUPPORT OF ASSOCIATION OF ERIE COUNTY GOVERNMENTS RESOLUTION to AMEND the “SAFE ACT”
WHEREAS, the Village Board has reviewed a resolution brought forth by the Association of Erie County Governments requesting the repealing and amending of the “Safe Act” gun control law, and
WHEREAS, The Village Board agrees that the Association of Erie County Governments represents the voice of the people in Erie County.
NOW BE IT RESOLVED, the Village of Angola Board hereby approves the repealing and amending of the “Safe Act” legislation and is in support of said resolution brought forth by the Association of Erie County Governments to this regard.
MOTION MADE by Trustee Wilson, seconded by Trustee Kin, unanimously carried
RESOLUTION 021913
OPPOSING THE PROCESS OF ENACTMENT AND CERTAIN PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE NY SAFE ACT
On a motion by Councilman Bliek and seconded by Councilman Lee, the following resolution was duly put to a vote by roll call which resulted in the following:
Councilman Bliek Yes
Councilman Fonte Yes
Councilman Kauffman Yes
Councilman Lee Yes
Supervisor Bender Yes
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Marion Town Board opposes the process of enactment and certain provisions contained in the NY Safe Act.
·Resolution 4-2013: Repeal of NY Safe Act Legislation
Councilman Panek urged the Town Board Members to consider passing a Resolution to request repeal of recent NYS Safe Act Legislation regarding gun control in NYS.
After a brief discussion amongst the Board Members Councilman Panek introduced the following Resolution to the Board Members for their review and action:
RESOLUTION NO. 4 DATED: February 11, 2013 – Request repeal of any legislation within the 2013 NY State SAFE Act
WHEREAS,
The Stafford Town Board does hereby oppose, and request the repeal of, any legislation, including the sections within the NY SAFE Act (Chapter1 of the Laws of 2013), which infringe upon the right of the people to keep and bear arms.
The Stafford Town Board does endorse the January 24th 2013 New York State Sheriff’s Association Response to the New York Safe Act. The Stafford Town Board wishes to emphasis our agreement with the New York Sheriff’s Association’s assessment on the method which was used to pass this legislation (bolded below)
New York Sheriff’s Association Response to the New York Safe Act
Following passage of the SAFE Act by the State Legislature and approval by the Governor, the Sheriffs now have had the opportunity to review the language of the new law and wish to make our comments available. The Sheriffs of New York state support many of the provisions of the SAFE Act, and believe that they will enhance public safety and help to shield citizens from gun violence. However, there are also some parts of this new law that need clarification, and some that we think should be reconsidered and modified to meet the concerns of the law enforcement community and the public at large. We have identified the following six provisions of the new law which we believe are helpful and will increase the safety of our citizens. These include:
• Restriction on FOIL requests about pistol permit holders. By granting citizens the option of having their names and addresses withheld from public disclosure, the new law does provide a mechanism to allow people to decide for themselves whether their personal information should be accessible to the public. We believe, however, that no one should have to explain why their personal information should remain confidential. A better procedure, we believe, is simply to exempt all this personal information from FOIL disclosure.
• Killing of emergency first responders. The new law makes killing of emergency first responders aggravated or first degree murder, enhancing penalties for this crime and requiring life without parole. First responders need this protection, evidenced all too often by attacks on them when they attempt to provide help, and in special recognition of the terrible attacks on two firefighters in Webster, NY and attacks on first responders in Jefferson County.
• Requirement of NICS checks for private sales (except between immediate family). We believe that this will ensure that responsible citizens will still be able to obtain legal firearms through private transactions, with the added assurance that private buyers are approved by the federal National Instant Criminal Background Check System. We remain concerned that this provision will be very difficult to enforce and will likely only affect law abiding citizens.
• Comprehensive review of mental health records before firearms permits are granted and review of records to determine if revocation of permits is required. Sheriffs believe that there is an urgent need to increase funding for mental health care. The new law imposes reporting requirements on many mental health care professionals and others who may make a determination that a person is a danger to himself or others. The law further gives needed authority to courts or others who issue firearms permits to deny permit applications or to revoke permits already issued. We believe that this issue demands a much more full and detailed discussion about how to keep guns out of the hands of such people. The Sheriffs of New York want to pursue these issues with the Governor and the State Legislature.
• Safe storage of firearms. The new law provides that guns must be safely stored if the owner lives with someone who has been convicted of a felony or domestic violence crime, has been involuntarily committed, or is currently under an order of protection. We agree that firearms owners should have the responsibility to make sure that their weapons are safeguarded against use or access by prohibited persons, and the new law adds these protections to ensure that weapons are safely and securely stored.
• Increased penalties for illegal use of weapons. The new law adds several increased sanctions for violation of New York gun laws and creates new gun crimes which did not previously exist. These new provisions will provide added tools for law enforcement to prosecute such crimes. We further believe that the new provisions should help deter future misuse of firearms. We also suggest that the legislature consider limitations on plea bargaining for all gun crimes.
We have reviewed other provisions of the new law, and strongly believe that modifications are needed to clarify the intent of some of these new provisions and that revisions are needed to allow Sheriffs to properly enforce the law in their counties.
• Assault weapon ban and definition of assault weapons. We believe that the new definition of assault weapons is too broad, and prevents the possession of many weapons that are legitimately used for hunting, target shooting and self defense. Classifying firearms as assault weapons because of one arbitrary feature effectively deprives people the right to possess firearms which have never before been designated as assault weapons. We are convinced that only law abiding gun owners will be affected by these new provisions, while criminals will still have and use whatever weapons they want.
• Inspection of schools by state agencies. The new law transfers to state agencies the responsibility to review school safety plans. We expect that funding will be transferred to these state agencies to implement safety proposals. Sheriffs and local police provide this service in all parts of the state and can perform these duties efficiently. As the chief law enforcement officer of the county, Sheriffs are in the best position to know the security needs of schools in their own counties, and the state should help to fund these existing efforts by Sheriffs and local police departments to keep our schools safe.
Because Sheriffs and local police are already deeply involved with school safety plans, have developed emergency response plans, and are familiar with structural layouts of schools in their counties, they should be included along with state counterparts in any effort to review school safety plans.
• Reduction of ammunition magazine capacity. The new law enacts reductions in the maximum capacity of gun magazines. We believe based on our years of law enforcement experience that this will not reduce gun violence. The new law will unfairly limit the ability of lawabiding citizens to purchase firearms in New York. It bears repeating that it is our belief that the reduction of magazine capacity will not make New Yorkers or our communities safer.
• Five year recertification of pistol permit status and registration of existing assault weapons. The new law delegates to the State Police the duty to solicit and receive updated personal information of permit holders every five years in order to maintain these permits. Further, the law requires owners of certain existing firearms now classified as assault weapons to register these with the State Police within one year. The recertification and registration conflict with Sheriffs’ duties regarding issuance of pistol permits. All records should be maintained at the local, and not the state level. This information should be accessible to those who are responsible for initial investigation of permit applications. Pistol permit information should be maintained in one file at the local level, and forwarded to a statewide database for law enforcement use. It bears repeating that it is our belief that pistol permit and any registration information required by the law should be confidential and protected from FOIL disclosure.
• Sale of ammunition. The new law imposes several new provisions regarding how, and from whom, ammunition can be lawfully purchased. The law should be clarified about the use of the Internet as a vehicle for these sales, out‐of‐state sales to New York residents, and other issues. Businesses have said that they do not understand the new provisions and are concerned that they will have to cease operations.
• Law enforcement exemptions must be clarified. The new law has many provisions that might apply to law enforcement officers and there has been much confusion about whether existing law enforcement exemptions continue to apply. We understand that the Governor and Legislature have already agreed to review and modify these provisions where necessary, and the Sheriffs want to be part of the discussion to make the changes effective. Additionally, the exemptions should apply to retired police and peace officers, and to others in the employ of the Sheriff and other police agencies who perform security duties at public facilities and events.
• Method of bill passage. It is the view of the Sheriffs’ Association that anytime government decides it is necessary or desirable to test the boundaries of a constitutional right that it should only be done with caution and with great respect for those constitutional boundaries. Further, it should only be done if the benefit to be gained is so great and certain that it far outweighs the damage done by the constriction of individual liberty. While many of the provisions of the new law have surface appeal, it is far from certain that all, or even many, of them will have any significant effect in reducing gun violence, which is the presumed goal of all of us. Unfortunately the process used in adoption of this act did not permit the mature development of the arguments on either side of the debate, and thus many of the stakeholders in this important issue are left feeling ignored by their government. Even those thrilled with the passage of this legislation should be concerned about the process used to secure its passage, for the next time they may find themselves the victim of that same process. Fortunately, the Governor has shown himself open to working with interested parties to address some of the problems that arose due to the hasty enactment of this law. We will work with the Governor and the Legislature on these issues.
• Sheriffs understand their Constitutional obligations and the concerns of constituents
Sheriffs and other law enforcement officers are not called upon by this new legislation to go door‐to‐door to confiscate any weapons newly classified as assault weapons, and will not do so. Sheriffs represent all the people, and we take an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of New York. Sheriffs will continue to enforce all laws of the state and will protect the rights of all citizens, including those rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of New York.
Offered by: Councilperson Panek
Second by: Councilperson Pacer
Passes by a vote of 5 yeas and 0 nays.
Roll Call vote as follows:
Councilperson Vicary Yes
Councilperson Mullen Yes
Councilperson Panek Yes
Councilperson Pacer Yes
Supervisor Clement Yes
Resolution #2 2013
Offered by: Supervisor Wells
Seconded by: Councilman Rathbun
Resolution to Oppose The Process Of Enactment And Certain Provisions Contained Within The New York SAFE Act
WHEREAS, the right of the people to keep and bear arms is guaranteed as an individual right under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution; and
WHEREAS, the right of the people to keep and bear arms for defense of life, liberty, and property is regarded as an inalienable right by the people of Hamilton County and the Town of Indian Lake
WHEREAS, the lawful ownership of firearms is, and has been, a valued tradition in Indian Lake, and the rights protected by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution are exercised by many of our residents; and
WHEREAS, the people of Indian Lake derive economic and environmental benefits from all safe forms of recreation involving firearms, including, but not limited to, hunting and target shooting while utilizing all types of firearms available under the Constitution of the United States; and
WHEREAS, members of the Town Board of the Town of Indian Lake ,being elected to represent the people of Indian Lake are duly sworn by their oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States; and
WHEREAS, members of the New York State Assembly and the New York State Senate, being elected by the people of New York State, are duly sworn by their oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States; and
WHEREAS, the enactment of the NY SAFE Act (Chapter 1 of the Laws of 2013) has engendered significant controversy over both the process by which it was enacted and certain provisions contained within it; and
WHEREAS, it is our understanding that many State Legislators had less than an hour to read the legislation, which contained approximately twenty-five thousand words, before being forced to vote on it; and
WHEREAS, having reviewed the legislation and time constraints, it is our conclusion that there is no possible way any individual could have read the entire bill and understood its full implications prior to voting on it; and
WHEREAS, our State Legislators most certainly could not have had the time to request, and receive, the input of their constituents regarding this matter; and
WHEREAS, seeking, and considering, such public input is a standard to which we hold ourselves to in Indian Lake and
WHEREAS, this legislation has 60 sections, of which only three take effect immediately; and
WHEREAS, in our opinion, there was no reason for the Governor to use a message of necessity to bring this bill to vote immediately and bypass the three day maturing process for all legislation; and
WHEREAS, the mishandling of the process in crafting the NY SAFE Act resulted in complex policy changes, many of which have been left up to interpretation, and are confusing even to the State Legislators who voted on them, and the law enforcement officials who are required to enforce and explain them; and
WHEREAS, requiring law-abiding gun owners to verify ownership of certain types of firearms every five years, in addition to registering them on their permits, which now also must be renewed every 5 years, does not increase the safety of the public and is unnecessarily burdensome to the residents of New York State; and
WHEREAS, there will be a significant financial impact due to Hamilton County permits that will have to be renewed requiring additional manpower ; and
WHEREAS, this legislation prohibits the sale of firearm magazines with a capacity larger than seven rounds; and
WHEREAS, those firearm magazines with a capacity larger than seven rounds, which are authorized to be retained by existing owners, may only be loaded with seven rounds and eventually must be permanently altered to only accept seven rounds or be disposed of, thus constituting a seizure of legally owned personal property with no provision for compensation; and
WHEREAS, few or no low capacity (7 rounds or less) magazines currently exist for many of the firearms commonly possessed by law-abiding residents of New York State; and
WHEREAS, limiting the number of rounds to seven versus ten is arbitrary and capricious, has no correlation to public safety, unfairly burdens law-abiding gun owners, and puts an undue burden on gun manufacturers to retool their manufacturing plants; and
WHEREAS, the only persons who will comply with the new high-capacity magazine ban are law-abiding citizens, leaving the same high-capacity magazines in the hands of those who choose not to obey the law; and
WHEREAS, requiring documentation of all ammunition sales in New York State, as provided for in this legislation, is a significant unfunded mandate on business; and
WHEREAS, the New York State Combined Ballistic Identification System, which wasted $44 million in taxpayer money and resulted in zero convictions, illustrates the propensity of government to waste taxpayer resources when legislation is not properly reviewed; and
WHEREAS, Governor Cuomo has proposed spending $36 million dollars in his 2013-2014 Executive budget for the implementation of the NY SAFE Act at a time when New York State residents are crying out for tax relief; and
WHEREAS, this legislation severely impacts the possession and use of firearms now employed by the residents of the Town of Indian Lake for defense of life, liberty, and property; and
WHEREAS, this legislation severely impacts the possession and use of firearms now employed for safe forms of recreation including, but not limited to, hunting and target shooting; and
WHEREAS while there are some areas of the legislation that the Town Board of the Town of Indian Lake finds encouraging, such as addressing glaring shortcomings in the mental health system, the strengthening of Kendra’s Law and Mark’s law, as well as privacy protections for certain of pistol permit holders, by-and-large, we find the legislation does little more then negatively impact lawful gun ownership; and
WHEREAS, this legislation fails to offer any meaningful solutions to gun violence and places increased burdens where they do not belong, squarely on the backs of law-abiding citizens; and
WHEREAS, this legislation effectively turns countless New York State law-abiding gun owners into criminals; and
WHEREAS, the manner in which this legislation was brought forward for vote in the State Legislature is deeply disturbing to the Town Board of the Town of Indian Lake, now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Indian Lake does hereby oppose, and request the repeal of, any legislation, including the sections within the NY SAFE Act (Chapter1 of the Laws of 2013), which infringe upon the right of the people to keep and bear arms; and further be it
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Indian Lake considers such laws to be unnecessary and beyond lawful legislative authority granted to our State representatives; and further be it
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Indian Lake strongly encourages members of the New York State Legislature to hold public hearings to address the issue of gun violence in a way that will produce meaningful results; and further be it
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town Indian Lake requests the members of the New York State Senate and Assembly who represent all, or part of, Hamilton County to reply, in writing, with their views on, and actions taken, in support of, or opposition to, the NY SAFE Act; and further be it
RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be sent to, Governor Andrew Cuomo, Senator Charles Schumer, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, Congressman Bill Owens New York State Senators Hugh Farley and Assemblyman Marc Butler,
Roll Call: Councilman Valentine Nay
Councilwoman Stanton Nay
Councilwoman Locke Aye
Councilman Rathbun Aye
Supervisor Wells Aye
Councilwoman Stanton explained to all present that she has been researching this since last week. However in good conscience she finds it difficult to ask for a repeal of the Safe Act when there are things in it she feels are extremely valuable (such as the penalties for killing of an emergency responder and the mental health reviews). She told all that she completely supported the Resolution the County voted on from the Sheriff’s Association, copy of County Resolution attached herein, because these are the people on the front line and they will be the ones having to enforce these laws. Some of which she knows will be difficult. She asked the Board to support the County Resolution that was in support of the New York State Sherriff’s Association. Kim Mitchell stated that he had read this Resolution and a lot of it was for the Law Officer’s themselves’ and he felt that it basically said the same thing as the Resolution the Board just passed concerning the clips. She Stated that this one states that they are willing to set down and hammer out the difficulties in the Law. Kim stated that he feels the same way, he knows there are good things in the Law that he supports, but the way Governor Cuomo did this should not have been done. He felt that the Governor jumped the gun without talking to relevant people, such as the State Police, he feels that he dumped everything into their laps as well as putting forty million dollars in his budget for the gun control bill, while saying he did not raise taxes. Kim feels that this was done totally illegally and against the Constitution. Many people such as Rick Ackerman and Raynard Corrow, from the community reiterated what Kim had said. They asked why not repeal it and start over and do it right, how they did it was wrong. Supervisor Wells stated that he supports the County Resolution also and there wasn’t that much difference and the message is the same. Councilwoman Stanton made a motion to support the County Resolution in support of the New York State Sherriff’s Association. Seconded by, Supervisor Wells.
Supervisor Wells reiterated to all that the Board had already voted on the Resolution # 2, opposing the safe act law, and this was a motion to support the County Resolution.
Roll Call: Councilman Valentine Aye
Councilwoman Stanton Aye
Councilwoman Locke Aye
Councilman Rathbun Aye
Supervisor Wells Aye
RESOLUTION OF COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT JERVIS SUPPORTING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
WHEREAS, the Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms is guaranteed as an Individual Right under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and under the Constitution of the State of New York, and;
WHEREAS, the Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms for defense of Life, Liberty, and Property is regarded as an Inalienable Right by the People of the City of Port Jervis, Orange County, New York, and:
WHEREAS, the People of the City of Port Jervis, Orange County, New York, derive economic benefit from all safe forms of firearms recreation, hunting, and shooting conducted in the areas surrounding and abutting the City while using all types of firearms allowable under the United States Constitution and the Constitution of the State of New York, and;
WHEREAS, the City of Port Jervis, being elected to represent the People of Port Jervis and being duly sworn by their Oath of Office to uphold the United States Constitution and the Constitution of the State of New York, and;
WHEREAS, the New York State Assembly and the New York State Senate, being elected by the People of the State of New York and being duly sworn by their Oath of Office to uphold the United States Constitution and the Constitution of the State of New York, and;
WHEREAS, legislation passed by the New York Assembly and Senate infringes on the Right to Keep and Bear Arms and would ban the possession and use of firearms now employed by individual citizens of the City of Port Jervis, for defense of Life, Liberty and Property and would ban the possession and use of firearms now employed for safe forms of firearms recreation, hunting and shooting in lands surrounding and abutting the City of Port Jervis, Orange County, New York;
WHEREAS, the City of Port Jervis Common Council believes there are many other less intrusive means available, other than rash, confusing, and inarticulately drafted firearms laws that would effectively, control, manage, and reduce violence in our society, such as, mental health reforms, anti-bullying programs for schools, enforcement of existing firearms laws to the fullest extent possible, and proper psychological counseling for those in need or who request it;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT BE AND IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the City of Port Jervis Common Council does hereby oppose the enactment of any legislation that would infringe upon the Right of the People to keep and bear arms and consider such laws to be unnecessary and beyond lawful legislative authority granted to our State representatives, as there is no documented correlation between gun control measures and crime reduction.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be sent to President Barack Obama, Vice President Joseph Biden, Senator Charles Schumer, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, Congressman Sean Patrick Maloney, Governor Andrew Cuomo, Senator John Bonacic and Assemblywoman Annie Rabbitt.
New York SAFE Act
Resolution #10
WHEREAS, The New York State Constitution requires a three-day waiting period between the introduction of any legislation and the vote on it but a special clause allows the Governor, in the event of an emergency, to issue a “message of necessity” suspending the three-day waiting period; and
WHEREAS, the Senate and Assembly, utilizing a message of necessity from the Governor, passed the New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement (SAFE) Act without debate or an opportunity for the public comment; and
WHEREAS, despite the message of necessity, of 56 sections in the bill, 51 won’t be effective for 60 days, several not for a year, and just two were immediate; and
WHEREAS, the message of necessity has become an increasingly used method for Governors and the legislature to disregard the requirements of the law requiring time to debate legislation; and
WHEREAS, while Governor Cuomo used the message of necessity 34 times during his tenure as governor in 2011 and 2012, compared to 57 times in 2010 alone, he has still used such messages to foreclose debate on controversial issues such as Marriage Equality bill in 2011; and
WHEREAS, a 2004 report by the Brennan Center for Justice found that 27 percent of all major legislation passed issued from a message of necessity and from 1997 through 2001, 95.5% of the major legislation in the Assembly and 95.1% in the Senate were passed without any debate; and
WHEREAS, a message of necessity from the Governor does not require the legislature to immediately vote on a bill, it simply allows them to bypass the three day waiting period; and
WHEREAS, representative democracy demands that both citizens and their legislators have a full and fair opportunity to inform themselves about the purpose and content of proposed legislation in order to fully research and debate the issue presented; and
WHEREAS, Whatever the viewpoint on the merits of a particular issue, all citizens should agree that a full and fair debate of issues can only lead to better legislation; and
WHEREAS, the state of Connecticut, in which the Newtown shooting occurred, has chosen the path of reasoned research and debate by conducting public hearings before taking action; and
WHEREAS, groups such as the NY State Sheriff’s Association and New York State Association of County Clerks have pointed out numerous difficulties and issues with the NY SAFE Act that would have been avoided had the public and relevant organizations been allowed to comment and assist in the drafting of this legislation; and
WHEREAS, local governments also have an emergency message option, but that is tempered by the need for a two third majority to pass legislation introduced pursuant to an emergency message; and
WHEREAS, this legislation also results in additional unfunded mandates upon local governments in a time of extreme financial pressure; and now therefore be it
RESOLVED, that the Town of Cambridge condemns the use of a message of necessity to pass the New York SAFE Act; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the Town of Cambridge further call upon the Governor and legislative leaders to drastically reduce the use of the message of necessity to those truly emergent occasions for which it was intended; and be it further
RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be sent to State Senator Elizabeth Little.
Supervisor Watkins requested a motion to adopt this resolution.
Councilman Ford motioned,
Seconded by Councilman McMurray,
That the Town of Cambridge, Town Board support the New York SAFE Act Resolution.
Vote: Ayes – 4 Noes – 0
From town minutes. PDF: February 11 2013 Saratoga Town Board Meeting Minutes.
The Town Board voiced the following reasons for opposing the NY Safe Act:
On a motion by Councilman Michael McLoughlin and seconded by Councilman Fred Drumm the following Resolution #13-42 – Opposition to the NY Safe Act passed 01/14/2013 was adopted by vote: Supervisor Thomas Wood – aye, Councilman Fred Drumm – aye, Councilman Charles Hanehan – aye, Councilman Michael McLoughlin – aye, Councilman James Jennings – absent Carried 4 – 0.
WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Saratoga endorses and upholds the 2nd Amendment to the United States Constitution: “A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”; now therefore be it
RESOLVED, by the Town Board of the Town of Saratoga to oppose the law passed on January 14, 2013, referred to as the NY Safe Act. We condemn the action taken and the way in which the New York Secure Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013 was enacted and the governor’s use of Message of Necessity to limit the debate and input on the proposal.