Monthly Archives: May 2013

Pierrepont passes anti-SAFE act resolution unanimously

The Pierrepont town board voted unanimously to pass a resolution opposing the SAFE Act.

Town Supervisor Thomas E. Latimer said he has been approached by numerous citizens asking the town to oppose Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo’s gun control legislation.

“We’ve been asked to pass a resolution opposing the SAFE Act,” he said.

The resolution was passed prior to a planned presentation from Will Gray, a local gun rights activist who has been traveling to town and village board meetings and encouraging municipalities to pass resolutions opposing the bill.

“I actually came with copies of resolutions and the SAFE Act to try and convince you to repeal the SAFE Act,” Mr. Gray said. “And you guys already did it. You are amazing. This is the easiest talk I’ve ever given.”

While Mr. Gray said he’s not sure if the law will actually be overturned, he did say the more opposition it receives the better.

“The more towns and villages we can get on board, the better off we’ll be,” he said, adding that to the best of his knowledge, St. Lawrence County, Lisbon, Colton, Norwood, Brasher and now Pierrepont have all passed such resolutions. The town of Parishville is drafting one that they are expected to pass at their next meeting.

Read more…

Town of Gorham resolution opposing the NY SAFE act

Resolution regarding the NY Safe Act. Barb and Don Christmas provided a draft resolution opposing the enactment of any legislation that would infringe upon the rights of the people to keep and bear arms, calling for the NY Safe Act to be repealed, for the Board’s consideration. Boardmembers briefly discussed the document. Supervisor Lightfoote stated that we could not act on this tonight, we need more time to review it as well as the NY Safe Act, the NY Constitution and the US Constitution.

Mrs. Christmas stated that there might be a deadline for such resolutions, a time limit when the Safe Act could be appealed. The document should be sent to State representatives etc.

Mr. and Mrs. Christmas thanked the Board for considering their request.

On the motion by Councilmember Glitch, seconded by Councilmember Negley, a motion was made to adopt the resolution calling for the NY Safe Act to be repealed. There was no emergency therefore should never have been enacted, there was no imminent threat or danger to the State, the three day review period should have been implemented. Roll call vote was taken: Councilmembers Glitch, Negley, Adam-Anderson and Case and Supervisor Lightfoote all voting YES.

Motion carried. (5-0). 055-2013

Resolution in Support of the Second Amendment

Whereas, the Gorham Town Board, being elected to represent the people of Gorham and being duly sworn by their Oath of office to uphold the United States Constitution and the Constitution of the State of New York, and;

Whereas, the New York State Assembly and New York State Senate, being elected By the People of the State of New York, and being duly sworn by their Oath of Office to uphold the United States Constitution and the Constitution of the State of New York, and;
Whereas, the right of the People to keep and bear arms is guaranteed as an individual right under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and under the Constitution of the State of New York; and

Whereas, the right of the People to keep and bear arms for the defense of life, liberty, and property is regarded as an inalienable right by the People of the Town of Gorham, Ontario County, New York; and

Whereas, on January 15,2013 the Legislature of the State of New York passed named NY SAFE Act which contains multiple violations of said rights; and

Whereas, this passage occurred within a period of less than twenty-four hours of introduction to the legislature, thereby not allowing the mandatory three day review period; and

Whereas, each and every bill that comes before the New York State Legislature before and enactment deserves a fair and open discussion that supports the people’s right to know and access to information which incorporates all points of view in order to ensure that all citizens are heard and that the Legislation has its intended purpose, and in this case benefits the people of the State of New York in reducing gun violence; and

Whereas, the NY SAFE Act bans the possession and use of firearms now employed by individual citizens of the Town of Gorham for the defense of Life, Liberty, Property and would ban possession and use of firearms now employed for safe forms of firearms recreation, hunting and shooting conducted within the Town of Gorham, Ontario County, New York;

Whereas, The Gorham Town Board believes that there are many other less intrusive means available, that would effectively reduce, control, and manage violence in our society, such as, mental health reforms, enforcement of existing firearms laws to the fullest extent possible, and proper psychological counseling for those in need or requesting it; and

Now, therefore, it be and is hereby Resolved that the Gorham Town Board does hereby oppose the enactment of any legislation that would infringe upon the Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms and consider such laws to be unnecessary and beyond lawful legislative authority granted to our State representatives, as there is no documented correlation between gun control measures and crime reduction.

Be it Resolved that the Town Board of Gorham finds these aforementioned and any other infringements upon the rights of the citizens to keep and bear arms unconstitutional and illegal.

Be it Resolved that the Town Board of Gorham does hereby propose the repeal of the NY SAFE ACT.

Be it further Resolved that copy of the resolution be sent to…..

Motion

Roll call

Town of Madrid resolution opposing the NY SAFE act

At a regular Madrid Town Board meeting held on May 8, 2013 the Board passed the following resolution:

OPPOSING A NUMBER OF PROVISIONS ENACTED UNDER THE NEW YORK SAFE ACT AND THE MANNER IN WHICH IT WAS ENACTED

WHEREAS, many of the residents of the Town of Madrid have expressed their displeasure not only with the provisions of the NY Safe Act itself, but also the manner and method used to bring it to the floor and vote it into law, and

WHEREAS, using a message of necessity to bring forth and enact a law that has dozens of sections and changes in current laws, but only three of which take effect immediately, negates the argument that the speed with which this bill was brought forward was necessary, and

WHEREAS, the sheer size of the bill, the extent of the many new changes it brings and the very short time that the bill was made available to the New York State Senate and Assembly for review, effectively precluded discussion and debate on the provisions set forth in the bill, preventing the mature development of arguments, both for and against, and

WHEREAS, in an attempt to bring forth meaningful solutions for dealing with or preventing gun violence, this legislation and the majority of its provisions affect law abiding gun owners in negative and unnecessary ways, and they were not given the opportunity to express their views or otherwise comment on the bill, and

WHEREAS, while there are provisions of the bill that have merit, for example; increased penalty for killing emergency responders, NICS checks for private sales of firearms, safe storage provisions, mental health record review, and increased penalties for the illegal use of a weapon; other provisions of the law, which run roughshod over second amendment rights, must be reconsidered and a new law should be introduced in a transparent manner, and it must be given the time necessary to review its provisions, engage in meaningful and constructive debate and allow public review, comment and input relative to the content of the bill, and

WHEREAS, the New York SAFE Act, as passed, will require County Clerks to carry out several provisions of the law but fails to address the responsibility for funding those additional duties, thus inflicting another unfunded mandate on already cash strapped counties,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Madrid Town Board strongly encourages the members of the New York State Legislature to bring forth a bill that addresses the real problems confronted by today’s society and not jeopardize the rights of law abiding citizens, and allow time for public comment, and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this resolution be sent to Governor Andrew Cuomo, Senator Patty Ritchie, Senator Joseph Griffo, Senator Elizabeth O’C Little, Assemblyman Kenneth Blankenbush, Assemblywoman Addie Russell, Assemblyman Marc Butler, Assemblywoman Janet Duprey, and the Board of each County of the State of New York.

I, Judy Hargrave, Clerk of the Town of Madrid Town Board, do hereby certify, that I have compared this resolution entitled “Opposing a Number of Provisions Enacted under the New York SAFE Act and the Manner in Which it was Enacted”, adopted May 8, 2013, with the original record in this office and the same is a correct transcript thereof and of the whole of said original record.

_________________________
Judy Hargrave, Town Clerk
Town of Madrid
May 10, 2013

Town of Clermont resolution calling for repeal of the SAFE act

RESOLUTION OPPOSING THE PROCESS OF ENACTMENT OF AND CERTAIN PROVISIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THE NEW YORK SAFE ACT

WHEREAS, The Town Board of Clermont has long advocated for protection of the rights afforded to citizens under the Constitution, which has for generations guided our Nation and served as a framework to our democracy and society; and

WHEREAS, The Second Amendment of the United States provides for the “right of the people to keep and bear arms” and further states that this right “shall not be infringed”, and that this right has been a bedrock of our nation for over two centuries; and

WHEREAS, The New York State Legislature has recently adopted legislation, the NY Safe Act, proposed by Governor Cuomo to curtail these rights through the enactment of various anti-gun measures that will significantly impact legal gun owners and various businesses and suppliers of guns and related supplies and equipment; and

WHEREAS, This legislation was approved with scant public notice, very little public debate or review by State Lawmakers, and in the days since the legislation was introduced and enacted, concerns have arisen regarding various matters of law and potential defects in the legislation; and

WHEREAS, the Clermont Town Board believes that portions of the Act are necessary and will in fact increase the safety of the citizens. However, other provisions of the Act appear to be unnecessary, arbitrary, ill-advised and contrary rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and reaffirmed by the United States Supreme Court and the Courts of the State of New York; and

WHEREAS, the Clermont Town Board believes that an issue of this seriousness and effect should have been granted a respectful and appropriate period of debate, review and consideration; and

WHEREAS, As New York State already has some of the toughest gun legislation in the Country, including the Sullivan Act, and concerns have been voiced that this legislation will not improve public safety in the state, including concerns by Legislators who initially supported the legislation; and

WHEREAS, Additionally, Federal Lawmakers and the President are also considering legislation or executive orders that would further infringe on the Second Amendment; and

WHEREAS, This legislation will unfairly affect the rights of the many law-abiding gun owners in the Town of Clermont and New York State who are granted the right to keep and bear arms under the Constitution; and

WHEREAS, This legislation also does not adequately address the many acts of violence committed by criminals who are likely to ignore this legislation, and does not address the concerns of many residents, particularly those in rural communities, to possess firearms for the purpose of home or self defense, in accordance with the provisions of the Second Amendment; and

WHEREAS, this Legislation imposes a number of unfunded mandates on County government and taxpayers; and

WHEREAS, as written, the Act increases the stigma on the mentally ill; and

WHEREAS, 52 Counties, over 180 towns, and numerous law enforcement and other organizations have enacted resolutions opposing both the process of enactment of the Act as well as certain provisions contained therein; and

WHEREAS, The Clermont Town Board does hereby affirm support for the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the rights afforded to residents under the Constitution, and opposes attempts to infringe on those rights; now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED, That the Clermont Town Board affirms support for the Second Amendment, and states opposition to the legislation NY Safe Act adopted by the State Legislature restricting the rights of gun owners, and opposes attempts on the Federal level to implement new restrictions on these rights; and, be it further

RESOLVED, That this Legislative Body further requests that the NY Safe Act be repealed during the current state legislative session; and, be it further

RESOLVED, That the Clerk of this Legislative Body is hereby directed to transmit certified copies of this resolution to U.S. Senator Charles Schumer, U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, U.S. Representative Chris Gibson, Governor Andrew Cuomo, State Senator Kathy Marchione, and Assemblywoman Didi Barrett.

Town of Clermont resolution opposing frivolous use of messages of necessity

RESOLUTION OPPOSING FRIVOLOUS USE OF MESSAGES OF NECESSITY AND CALLING FOR DUE PROCESS IN NEW YORK LEGISLATIVE PROCESS FOR THE PROTECTION OF CIVIL LIBERTIES AND RIGHTS

WHEREAS, the Town Board of Clermont has long advocated for due process and careful and deliberate consideration of all legislative acts, in particular those which are controversial or have far reaching consequences; and

WHEREAS, the bedrock of the United States of America and its Constitutional form of government is its formation as a nation of law with due process and deliberation; and

WHEREAS, the New York State Constitution recognizes the need of due process, careful deliberation, and transparency in government by declaring that except in times of emergency, “no bill shall be passed or become a law unless it shall have been printed and upon the desks of the members, in its final form, at least three calendar legislative days prior to its final passage”; and

WHEREAS, the New York State Constitutional Conventions of 1915 and 1938 foresaw the danger of indiscriminate use of messages of necessity, the 1915 convention proposing an outright ban on messages of necessity, and the 1938 convention amending the constitution to require the Governor to certify the facts of the emergency and noting: “it is the hope of the members of the committee that if the Governor is required to certify facts which in his opinion constitute an emergency, it will not fall into a pro forma signing of a printed message…”; and

WHEREAS, the use of messages of necessity has sadly indeed become a pro forma convention used to cut short debate and pass controversial legislation in direct contravention to the spirit of the New York State Constitution; and

WHEREAS, messages of necessity have been used over 1,200 times since 1995, including 29 times by Governor Cuomo in 2011, 23 times by governor Spitzer in 2007, and 34 times by Governor Pataki in 2005; and

WHEREAS, messages of necessity have been used to pass controversial legislation such as the Redistricting Statute, the Tier VI Pensions, DNA Database, Teacher Evaluations, and Same Sex Marriage; and

WHEREAS, the Teacher Evaluation act has become a burden and unfunded mandate on local schools, and it seems to many that the end result will be more paperwork and less time for teaching; and

WHEREAS, the Same Sex Marriage act has been recognized to infringe on religious liberties and individual’s consciences, and causes a reduction in needed services when religious organizations are forced by law to stop providing a service or violate their conscience.

RESOLVED, The Town Board of Clermont, declares that messages of necessity are in the majority of cases not used in times of true emergency, and are therefore used frivolously and in contravention to the spirit of the New York State Constitution; and

RESOLVED, That this legislative body calls upon Governor Cuomo and his successors to only issue messages of necessity in times of true emergency; and calls upon the New York State Senate and Assembly to reject messages of necessity unless there is truly an emergency, and in such cases place a brief sunset provision on the bill in question so that a full debate can be held when the emergency is past; and

RESOLVED, That the Clerk of this Legislative Body is hereby directed to transmit certified copies of this resolution to U.S. Senator Charles Schumer, U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, U.S. Representative Chris Gibson, Governor Andrew Cuomo, State Senator Kathy Marchione, and Assemblywoman Didi Barrett.

 

 

 

REFERENCE INFORMATION ON STATISTICS IN RESOLUTION

1915 convention proposed an outright ban on messages of necessity

“Amendments to the State Constitution presented by the New York State federation of labor”, bullet 18, http://archive.org/stream/cu31924009908611#page/n321/mode/2up

“Address to the People of the State of New York”, Doc. No. 54, page 6, http://archive.org/stream/cu31924009908611#page/n737/mode/2up/search/emergency

1938 convention amended the constitution to require the Governor to certify the facts of the emergency

New York State Constitution, Article III §14, http://www.dos.ny.gov/info/constitution.htm

Maybee v. State of N.Y., 828 NE 2d 975 (N.Y. Ct. of Appeals 2005) citing 2 Revised Rec, 1938 NY Constitutional Convention, at 1435

Messages of necessity have been used over 1,200 times since 1995, including 29 times by Governor Cuomo in 2011, 23 times by governor Spitzer in 2007, and 34 times by Governor Pataki in 2005

http://effectiveny.org/fast-fact/message-necessity-immediate-vote/click-see-all-uses-1995

http://effectiveny.org/fast-fact/message-necessity-immediate-vote/cuomo-has-used-message-necessity-29-times-2011-spitzer-us

Messages of necessity have been used to pass controversial legislation such as the Redistricting Statute, the Tier VI Pensions, DNA Database, Teacher Evaluations, and Same Sex Marriage

http://effectiveny.org/issue/Message-of-Necessity-for-Immediate-Vote