Follow us on facebook
Follow us on Twitter
My Tweets-
Recent Posts
- Want to throw Cuomo out? The grassroots are doing a moneybomb!
- State officials won’t be able to use Ulster County seal for SAFE Act
- State officially denied use of Chenango county seal in SAFE Act
- Governor Cuomo’s office responds to our 2014 FOIL request
- Town of Clarkson resolution opposing the NY SAFE act
Categories
- County Seal (51)
- News (181)
- News favoring (9)
- News opposing (168)
- Resolutions (319)
- Resolutions favoring (1)
- Resolutions opposing (316)
- Uncategorized (9)
Recent Comments
- khal spencer on County Seal / Logo / Name resolutions
- Jim Trunk on Town of Pleasant Valley resolution calling for repeal of NY SAFE act.
- Limiting Liberty: How Governments Capitalize on Tragedy | PirateTimes on Resolutions
- What impact have SAFE Act gun laws had in Dutchess County? – Poughkeepsie Journal | Harvard Review on Dutchess County Deputy Sheriffs PBA statement on NY SAFE act
- Astorino campaign representative speaks with Vestal, NY residents | VASS political blog on Resolutions
Archives
Meta
Category Archives: Resolutions opposing
Town of Colton resolution calling for repeal of the NY SAFE act
ADOPT RESOLUTION # 11 – 2013
Motion made by Mr. Robert, seconded by Mrs. Hawley to adopt resolution # 11 – 2013, Repeal New York State Safe Act of 2013.
Ayes 3 Hawley, Robert, Shoen
Noes 0
Abstain 2 Bulger, Hayes
Motion carried.
Repeal NYS Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013 (NYS SAFE ACT of 2013)
Resolution # 11 – 2013
WHEREAS, New York State Legislature recently enacted and Governor Andrew M. Cuomo signed into law the New York State Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013 (NYS SAFE ACT), and
WHEREAS, Governor Andrew M. Cuomo enacted said law swiftly and without regard of the concerns or opinions of the Citizens of NY State, and
WHEREAS, the haste of our State Legislature and Governor passing this law has resulted in a law which is flawed and affects our State and local law enforcement officers in performing their duties, and
WHEREAS, the NY SAFE ACT is in direct contradiction of our rights under the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America and limits the rights of the Citizens of NY State to protect themselves as allowed under this Constitution from this very type of tyranny, and
WHEREAS, because of this law, gun manufacturers are now refusing to sell their firearms to local law enforcement agencies within states which do not allow the citizens of these states the right to own and or bear firearms as protected by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, and
WHEREAS, the definition of assault weapons as pertained in the NYS SAFE ACT of 2013 is opinionated and without merit, and
WHEREAS, the statistical history of murders committed in NY State show this law would have little or no effect on saving lives, and
WHEREAS, this law affects the rights of thousands of honest law abiding citizens that own and use the firearms that this law would make illegal and cause for mandatory registration of firearms and or magazines that have been used for many years by the citizens of NY State without incident and in fact be punishing these law abiding citizens for fear of the actions of a few, and
WHEREAS, this law will have no affect on the criminally insane or the people of this State that wish to do harm onto others with the use of a firearm as a weapon as there is no regard for laws, regulations or loss of life now when a crime is committed with an unlawful firearm.
SO BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town of Colton Town Board respectfully submit to the Governor of the State of New York, Andrew M. Cuomo to repeal the New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013 (NY SAFE ACT), and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be sent to the following: St. Lawrence County Administrator Karen St. Hilaire, St. Lawrence County Legislator Frederick S. Morrill, St. Lawrence County Sheriff Kevin Wells, Senator Charles Schumer, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, Senator Joseph A. Griffo, Senator Patricia A. Ritchie, Senator Elizabeth Little, Congressman Bill Owens, Assemblywoman Addie Russell, Assemblyman Kenneth Blankenbush, Assemblyman Marc Butler, New York State Assembly Leader Sheldon Silver and New York State Senate Leader Dean Skelos.
Albany Police Officers Union, local 2841, Council 82, AFSCME, AFI-CIO
FROM: Albany Police Officers Union, local 2841, Council 82, AFSCME, AFI-CIO, P.O BOX 6567, ALBANY, NEW YORK 12206 (518) 438-9422
To: Andrew M. Cuomo / Dean G. Skelos / Neil D. Breslin / John T- McDonald III / Phil Steck / Sheldon Silver / Jeffrey D. Klein / Cecilia Tkaczyk / Patricia Fahy
Note; see the formal list of people this letter went to at the bottom.
April 15,2013
Honorable Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Albany Police Officers Union condemns and opposes the New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act (the SAFE Act). Substantively, we believe that it violates fundamental constitutional rights, that it is unduly and purposely burdensome on law-abiding citizens, and” that it will not deter criminals or menially ill individuals from plotting and carrying out bloodshed and violence. Procedurally, we believe that the way in which the bill was rammed into law via an unjustified and expedient “message of necessity”, which circumvents the right and the ability of the citizens of this State to voice their concerns about the bill and have them addressed, is an outrage. This flawed law and the way in which it was rushed and passed, shows the apparent contempt that those who govern have for the governed, and calls into question whether we truly have a representational government. Morally, we believe that this law is about ideology and politics and not about making anyone any safer. We respectfully demand that you do the right thing and repeal the law.
First, while we applaud and support your overall concern for public safety and your desire to improve it. The SAFE Act will not improve public safety. Criminals and the mentally ill will not abide by it, and it is either foolish or dishonest to think or suggest otherwise. While law-abiding citizens will abide by the law and not load a ten-round magazine with more than seven rounds, do you really expect a criminal or mentally ill individual intent on doing violence not load ten rounds into a ten-round magazine? While law-abiding citizens will abide by the law that previously legal thirty-round magazines must be sold within one-year to an out-of-state resident or turn in to local authorities, do you really expect a criminal or mentally ill individual intent on doing violence to sell or turn in his thirty-round magazines? While law-abiding citizens will abide by the law requiring that they register weapons which they already do and which have been deemed “assault weapons”, do you really expect a criminal or mentally ill individual intent on doing violence to do so? Do you really expect a criminal or mentally ill individual intent on doing violence to be concerned about any increase in penalties for shooting first responders? Do you really expect that a mentally ill individual who owns firearms and who is intent on doing violence will voice his intentions to his or her mental health professional and thus put into motion the confiscation of his or her firearms? Do you really expect that a mentally ill individual will “safely store” his firearms? Of course you don’t. Again, only law-abiding citizens, who are not intent on doing violence, will abide the NY SAFE Act criminals and the mentally ill who are intent on doing violence will not do so. The public will not be any safer under this 1aw. What then, have you accomplished?
Second, the SAFE Act carries with it unfair burdens on law abiding citizen. What is the point of making law-abiding citizens register their previously lawfully owned and lawfully used firearms which are now deemed to be “assault weapons”? What is the point of making law-abiding citizens who affirmatively “opt into” protection from public identification that they hold permits or own firearms? What is the point of making law-abiding citizens renew their pistol permits or “assault weapon” registrations every five years? Why are you preemptively punishing those who have done nothing wrong?
Third, we fully believe that the SAFE ACT broad prohibitions against will not withstand constitutional challenge and scrutiny. The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides and U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the right of individuals to possess and carry firearms and to use them for lawful purposes. The SAFE Act, however, infringes on that right as it bans the possession and use of certain firearms that were heretofore possessed and” used lawfully for the defense of life, liberty, and property, and as it bans the possession and use of certain firearms that were heretofore possessed and used lawfully for safe use of firearms recreation, hunting, and shooting.
We as police officers are on the front lines of public safety. Respectfully, none of you are. We see, feel, work, and live with the effects of gun violence in ways that you cannot. We believe that you see gun violence as a means to move your agenda and your ambitions forward. You know that the SAFE Act will not work in the way that you pretend it will. You know that this shameful SAFE Act was about ideology and politics and not about making anyone safer.
Regarding the reduction in violent crime this new legislation is proposed to have, in 2011 the most current year for which FBI crime statistics are available, New York State had 77l homicides, 445 were committed with a firearm, 394 of that 445 were committed with a handgun, 5 were committed with a rifle, 16 were committed with a shotgun, in 30 the firearm type was unknown, 160 were committed with a cutting instrument, 143 were committed with another type of weapon, and 26 were committed with bare hands. We believe based on these statistics, that the SAFE Act will do nothing to reduce violent crime as the primary target of the legislation is the “assault rifle” which would be included statistically with standard rifles and used in less than 1% of New York homicides in 2011. These so called “Assault Weapons” were not used in the commission of one reported crime in Albany County in 2011.
For the reasons set forth above, the Albany Police Union believes that the SAFE Act is wrong – substantively, procedurally, and morally. The SAFE Act infringes on the rights of law-abiding citizens, it will burden and negatively impact firearms ownership by law-abiding citizens and will not affect the willingness of criminals or those who are mentally ill from perpetrating violence. Again, we respectfully demand that each and all of you do the right thing and repeal the law.
Very truly yours,
Thomas Mahar
President
Albany Police Officers Union, local 2841
Council 82, AFSCME, AFI-CIO
The Honorable Andrew M. Cuomo
Governor of New York State
New, York State Capitol
Albany, New York 12224
The Honorable Dean G. Skelos
Temporary President
New York State Senate
Legislative Office Building, Room 909
Albany, New York 12247
The Honorable Neil D. Breslin
New York State Senator
172 State Street Room 414, Capitol
Albany, New York 12247
The Honorable John T- McDonald III
New York State Assemblyman
Legislative Office Building, Room 913
Albany, New York 12248
The Honorable Phil Steck
New York State Assemblyman
Legislative Office Building, Room 819
Albany, New York 12248
The Honorable Sheldon Silver
Speaker, New York State Assembly
Legislative Office Building. Room 913
Albany, New York 12248
The Honorable Jeffrey D. Klein
Temporary President
New York State Senate
Legislative Office Building, Room 913
Albany, New York 12247
The Honorable Cecilia Tkaczyk
New York State Senator
Legislative Office Building, Room 311
Albany, New York 12247
The Honorable Patricia Fahy
New York State Assemblywoman
Legislative Office Building, Room 458
Albany, New York 12248
Town of Colton resolution opposing the SAFE Act
ADOPT RESOLUTION # 11 – 2013
Motion made by Mr. Robert, seconded by Mrs. Hawley to adopt resolution # 11 – 2013, Repeal New York State Safe Act of 2013.
Ayes 3 Hawley, Robert, Shoen
Noes 0
Abstain 2 Bulger, Hayes
Motion carried.
Repeal NYS Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013
(NYS SAFE ACT of 2013)
Resolution # 11 – 2013
WHEREAS, New York State Legislature recently enacted and Governor Andrew M. Cuomo signed into law the New York State Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013 (NYS SAFE ACT), and
WHEREAS, Governor Andrew M. Cuomo enacted said law swiftly and without regard of the concerns or opinions of the Citizens of NY State, and
WHEREAS, the haste of our State Legislature and Governor passing this law has resulted in a law which is flawed and affects our State and local law enforcement officers in performing their duties, and
WHEREAS, the NY SAFE ACT is in direct contradiction of our rights under the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America and limits the rights of the Citizens of NY State to protect themselves as allowed under this Constitution from this very type of tyranny, and
WHEREAS, because of this law, gun manufacturers are now refusing to sell their firearms to local law enforcement agencies within states which do not allow the citizens of these states the right to own and or bear firearms as protected by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, and
WHEREAS, the definition of assault weapons as pertained in the NYS SAFE ACT of 2013 is opinionated and without merit, and
WHEREAS, the statistical history of murders committed in NY State show this law would have little or no effect on saving lives, and
WHEREAS, this law affects the rights of thousands of honest law abiding citizens that own and use the firearms that this law would make illegal and cause for mandatory registration of firearms and or magazines that have been used for many years by the citizens of NY State without incident and in fact be punishing these law abiding citizens for fear of the actions of a few, and
WHEREAS, this law will have no affect on the criminally insane or the people of this State that wish to do harm onto others with the use of a firearm as a weapon as there is no regard for laws, regulations or loss of life now when a crime is committed with an unlawful firearm.
SO BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town of Colton Town Board respectfully submit to the Governor of the State of New York, Andrew M. Cuomo to repeal the New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013 (NY SAFE ACT), and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be sent to the following: St. Lawrence County Administrator Karen St. Hilaire, St. Lawrence County Legislator Frederick S. Morrill, St. Lawrence County Sheriff Kevin Wells, Senator Charles Schumer, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, Senator Joseph A. Griffo, Senator Patricia A. Ritchie, Senator Elizabeth Little, Congressman Bill Owens, Assemblywoman Addie Russell, Assemblyman Kenneth Blankenbush, Assemblyman Marc Butler, New York State Assembly Leader Sheldon Silver and New York State Senate Leader Dean Skelos.
Resolution Passed in Town of Horicon
Passed unanimously March 21st.
RESOLUTION #56-2013
The Entire Town Board introduced Res. No. 56-2013 and moved its adoption, all Ayes:
RESOLUTION TO OPPOSE AND CALL FOR THE REPEAL OF THE NYS SAFE ACT
WHEREAS, the right of the people to keep and bear arms is guaranteed as an individual right under the second amendment of the United States Constitution and that this right is regarded as an inalienable right of the people of the Town of Horicon; and
WHEREAS, the lawful ownership of firearms is, and has been, a valued tradition in the Town of Horicon, and the rights protected by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution are exercised by many of our residents; and
WHEREAS, the people of the Town of Horicon derive economic and environmental benefits from all safe forms of recreation involving firearms, including, but not limited to, hunting and target shooting while utilizing all types of firearms available under the Constitution of the United states; and
WHEREAS, the NY SAFE ACT was adopted by the New York State Legislature and signed into law in an unprecedented expedited fashion and completely devoid of any opportunity for our elected State Legislators to study, review and debate the legislation and without any opportunity for the public to comment upon the legislation or to have any input whatsoever upon the legislation; and
WHEREAS, requiring law-abiding gun owners to verify ownership of certain types of firearms every 5 years, in addition to registering them on their permits, which now also must be renewed every 5 years, does not increase the safety of the public and is unnecessarily burdensome to the residents New York State; and
WHEREAS, the only persons who will comply with the new high-capacity magazine ban are law-abiding citizens, leaving the same high-capacity magazines in the hands of those who choose not to obey the law; and
WHEREAS, requiring documentation of all ammunition sales in New York State, as provided for in this legislation is a significant unfunded mandate on businesses; and
WHEREAS, the legislation fails to offer any meaningful solutions to gun violence and places burdens squarely on the backs of law-abiding citizens; and
WHEREAS, while there are some areas of the legislation that the Town Board of the Town of Horicon finds encouraging, such as addressing the glaring shortcomings in the mental health system, the strengthening of Kendra’s law and Mark’s law, as well as privacy protections for certain pistol permit holders, by-and-large, we find the legislation does little more than negatively impact lawful gun ownership;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Horicon does hereby oppose, and request the repeal of, any legislation, including the sections of the NY SAFE ACT (Chapter 1 of the Laws of 2013) which infringe upon the right of people to keep and bear arms; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Horicon strongly encourages the members of the New York State Legislature to hold public hearings to address the issue of gun violence in a way that will produce meaningful results; and be it further
Resolved, that the Clerk of the Town Board of the Town of Horicon be, and hereby is, authorized and directed to forward copies of this resolution to the Governor Andrew Cuomo; Senator Charles E. Schumer; Senator Kirsten E. Gillibrand; Congressman William Owens; Senator Elizabeth O’C. Little; and Assemblyman Daniel G. Stec
Town of Moriah Passes Resolution Requesting Repeal of SAFE Act
6.
ON MOTION by Councilman Garrison, seconded by Councilman Salerno, the following resolution was APPROVED
Ayes Garrison, Salerno, Scozzafava, Anderson
Nays 0
WHEREAS, the legislation effectively turns countless New York State law abiding citizens into criminals; and
WHEREAS, while there are some areas of the legislation that the Town of Moriah Town Board finds encouraging, such as addressing glaring shortcomings in the mental health system, the strengthening of Kendra’s Law and Mark’s Law (which provides additional penalties for assaulting first responders), as well as privacy protection for pistol permit holders, by and large, we find the legislation does little more than negatively impact lawful gun ownership;
NOW THERE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town of Moriah Town Board does hereby demand the repeal of all the sections of the New York SAFE Act which we believe infringes upon the right of the people to keep and bear arms; and in our opinion unconstitutional under both the Federal and State Constitutions; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Board strongly encourages the members of the New York State Legislature to hold public hearings to address the issue of gun violence in a way that will produce meaningful results; and be it further
RESOLVED that the Town of Moriah Town Board request the members of the New York State Senate and Assembly who represent all of the Town of Moriah for the repeal of the enactment of the New York SAFE Act.
Discussion: The Board of Supervisors have been beat up over this bill; everyone feels differently about this. We want the State to repeal the bill and start over, but doubts that will happen.
Resolution against SAFE Act passed in Town of Ovid
The Ovid Town Board unanimously passed a resolution calling for the repeal of the NY SAFE Act. A portion of the resolution reads:
RESOLUTION 2013-12 CALLING FOR THE REPEAL OF THE NEW YORK SAFE ACT OF 2013
By: The Ovid Town Board
WHEREAS, the New York State Legislature recently enacted and Governor Andrew Cuomo signed into law The New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013 (“NY SAFE ACT”); and
WHEREAS, the Legislation is viewed by many citizens of the State of New York as Being extremely controversial as those citizens view this Legislation as infringing upon their rights guaranteed to them under the second Amendment of the United States Constitution; and
WHEREAS, each and every issue that comes before the New York State Legislature before an enactment deserves a fair and open discussion which incorporates all points of view in order to ensure that all citizens are heard and that the Legislation incorporates the various points of view expressed during that discussion and benefits all of the citizens of the State of New York; and
WHEREAS, the NY SAFE ACT was adopted after minimal public discussion contains Serious flaws, I .e. police officers are not exempt and having been on the desks of the Members of the New York State Legislature for only a few hours, thereafter was literally adopted in the night and signed into law by Governor Andrew Cuomo; and
WHEREAS, in 2011 amendments were made to the Open M meetings Law (Public Officers Law Section 103), requiring a public body prior to a meeting to post on its website, to the extent practicable, for public benefit all records that may be considered or discussed at that meeting; and
WHEREAS, A. 107 has been pre-filed before the New York State Assembly for the 2O13-2014 Regular Session, to amend the Public Officers Law (Sections 84 and 90) in relation to publishing records of public interest by agencies and the State Legislature, reading in part “…The people’s right to know the process of governmental decision-making and to review the documents and statistics leading to determination is basic to our society. .Access to such information should not be thwarted by shrouding it with the cloak of secrecy or confidentiality…” and
WHEREAS, the State of New York has a tradition and long history of conducting its deliberations and debates in the public view and that in the enactment of the NYS SAFE ACT the New York State Legislature and Governor Andrew Cuomo acted in contradiction of this long, time honored tradition of an open government, and
WHEREAS, the members of the Ovid Town Board at their regular meeting held March 13, 2013 at Ovid, New York wish to express their concern that any legislation which addresses the ownership of guns and the sale of ammunition in the State of New York be conducted only after an open debate pursuant to which the public is allowed to participate and express their points of view, now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, that the Ovid Town Board calls for the repeal of The New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013 (“NY SAFE ACT”);
RESOLVED, that the Ovid Town Board support the positions adopted by resolution from the New York State County Clerk’s Association the State Sherriff’s Association.
RESOLVED, that the Ovid Town Board hereby directs that certified copies of this resolution be forwarded to Governor Andrew Cuomo, members of the New York State Legislature, NYSAC, NACo, New State Association of Towns, and each New York State County.
Moved By _ John Hubbard______
Seconded By _ Joseph Borst
Dated _March 13, 2013________ Town Clerk _
James E. Vangalio
James E. Vangalio
Ayes ____4______ Nays ____0______
Resolution Passed in Town of Albion
On April 8th, the Albion Town Board passed a resolution against the SAFE Act. Supervisor Dennis Stirk, Councilperson Daniel Poprawski and Councilperson Jake Olles voted “aye”. Councilpersons Matthew Passarell and Timothy Neilans abstained.
Resolution #61 Opposition to the Safe Act
OPPOSING THE PROCESS OF ENACTMENT AND CERTAIN PROVISIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THE NEW YORK SAFE ACT
WHEREAS, the right of the people to keep and bear arms is guaranteed as an individual right under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution; and
WHEREAS, the right of the people to keep and bear arms for defense of life, liberty, and property is regarded as an inalienable right by the people of the Town of Albion; and
WHEREAS, the lawful ownership of firearms is, and has been, a valued tradition in the Town of Albion, and the rights protected by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution are exercised by many of our residents; and
WHEREAS, the residents of the Town of Albion derive economic and environmental benefits from all safe forms of recreation involving firearms, including, but not limited to, hunting and target shooting while utilizing all types of firearms available under the Constitution of the United States; and
WHEREAS, The Town Board, being elected to represent the residents of the Town of Albion , are duly sworn by their oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States; and
WHEREAS, members of the New York State Assembly and the New York State Senate, being elected by the people of New York State, are duly sworn by their oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States; and
WHEREAS, the enactment of the NY SAFE Act (Chapter 1 of the Laws of 2013) has engendered significant controversy over both the process by which it was enacted and certain provisions contained within it; and
WHEREAS, it is our understanding that many State Legislators had less than an hour to read the legislation, which contained approximately twenty-five thousand words, before being forced to vote on it; and
WHEREAS, having reviewed the legislation and time constraints, it is our conclusion that there is no possible way any individual could have read the entire bill and understood its full implications prior to voting on it; and
WHEREAS, our State Legislators most certainly could not have had the time to request, and receive, the input of their constituents regarding this matter; and
WHEREAS, seeking and considering, such public input is a standard to which we hold ourselves in the Orleans County Legislature; and
WHEREAS, this legislation has 60 sections, of which only three take effect immediately; and
WHEREAS, in our opinion, there was no reason for the Governor to use a message of necessity to bring this bill to vote immediately and bypass the three day maturing process for all legislation; and
WHEREAS, the mishandling of the process in crafting the NY SAFE Act resulted in complex policy changes, many of which have been left up to interpretation, and are confusing even to the State Legislators who voted on them, and the law enforcement officials who are required to enforce and explain them; and
WHEREAS, requiring law-abiding gun owners to verify ownership of certain types of firearms every five years, in addition to registering them on their permits, which now also must be renewed every 5 years, does not increase the safety of the public and is unnecessarily burdensome to the residents of New York State; and
WHEREAS, there will be a significant financial impact due to the approximately 5,300 Orleans County permits that will have to be renewed requiring additional manpower and computer systems; and
WHEREAS, this legislation prohibits the sale of firearm magazines with a capacity larger than seven rounds; and
WHEREAS, those firearm magazines with a capacity larger than seven rounds, which are authorized to be retained by existing owners, may only be loaded with seven rounds and eventually must be permanently altered to only accept seven rounds or be disposed of, thus constituting a seizure of legally owned personal property with no provision for compensation; and
WHEREAS, few or no low capacity (7 rounds or less) magazines currently exist for many of the firearms commonly possessed by law-abiding residents of New York State; and
WHEREAS, limiting the number of rounds to seven versus ten is arbitrary and capricious, has no correlation to public safety, unfairly burdens law-abiding gun owners, and puts an undue burden on gun manufacturers to retool their manufacturing plants; and
WHEREAS, the only persons who will comply with the new high-capacity magazine ban are law-abiding citizens, leaving the same high-capacity magazines in the hands of those who choose not to obey the law; and
WHEREAS, requiring documentation of all ammunition sales in New York State, as provided for in this legislation, is a significant unfunded mandate on business; and
WHEREAS, the New York State Combined Ballistic Identification System, which wasted $44 million in taxpayer money and resulted in zero convictions, illustrates the propensity of government to waste taxpayer resources when legislation is not properly reviewed; and
WHEREAS, Governor Cuomo has proposed spending $36 million dollars in his 2013-2014 Executive budget for the implementation of the NY SAFE Act at a time when New York State residents are crying out for tax relief; and
WHEREAS, this legislation severely impacts the possession and use of firearms now employed by the residents of the Town of Albion for defense of life, liberty, and property; and
WHEREAS, this legislation severely impacts the possession and use of firearms now employed for safe forms of recreation including, but not limited to, hunting and target shooting; and
WHEREAS, while there are some areas of the legislation that the Albion Town Board finds encouraging, such as addressing glaring shortcomings in the mental health system, the strengthening of Kendra’s Law and Mark’s law, as well as privacy protections for certain pistol permit holders, by-and-large, we find the legislation does little more than negatively impact lawful gun ownership; and
WHEREAS, this legislation fails to offer any meaningful solutions to gun violence and places increased burdens where they do not belong, squarely on the backs of law-abiding citizens; and
WHEREAS, this legislation effectively turns countless New York State law-abiding gun owners into criminals; and
WHEREAS, the manner in which this legislation was brought forward for vote in the State Legislature is deeply disturbing to the Albion Town Board; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, that the Albion Town Board does hereby oppose, and request the repeal of, any legislation, including the sections within the NY SAFE Act (Chapter1 of the Laws of 2013), which infringe upon the right of the people to keep and bear arms; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Board considers such laws to be unnecessary and beyond lawful legislative authority granted to our State representatives; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Albion Town Board strongly encourages members of the New York State Legislature to hold public hearings to address the issue of gun violence in a way that will produce meaningful results; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Albion Town Board requests the members of the New York State Senate and Assembly who represent all, or part of, Orleans County to reply, in writing, with their views on, and actions taken, in support of, or opposition to, the NY SAFE Act; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be sent to President Barack Obama, Vice President Joseph Biden, Governor Andrew Cuomo, Senator Charles Schumer, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, Congressman Chris Collins, New York State Senator George Maziarz, Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, New York State Assembly members Steve Hawley and Jane Corwin, NYSAC, InterCounty of Western New York and all other deemed necessary and proper.
Resolution duly adopted by the following vote:
Councilperson Daniel Poprawski, aye
Councilperson Timothy Neilans, abstain
Supervisor Dennis Stirk, aye
Councilperson Jake Olles, aye
Councilperson Matthew Passarell, abstain
Village of Norwood resolution opposing the NY SAFE act
VILLAGE OF NORWOOD
PO BOX 182
Norwood NY 13668
315-353-2372
Village of Norwood Regular Board Meeting held April 15, 2013.
RESOLUTION OPPOSING A NUMBER OF PROVISIONS ENACTED UNDER THE NEW YORK SAFE ACT AND THE MANNER IN WHICH IT WAS ENACTED:
WHEREAS, the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the United States, specifically the Second Amendment of the Constitution, guarantees the right of the people to keep and bear arms and states further that that right “shall not be infringed”, and
WHEREAS, all individuals, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil or uniform services, take an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, and
WHEREAS, the Supreme Court of the United States, in the case District of Columbia v. Heller (554 U.S. 570), decided June 26, 2008, held that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that firearm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home, and
WHEREAS, in another landmark decision the same Supreme Court, in the case McDonald v.Chicago, decided June 28, 2010, held that the right of an individual to “keep and bear arms” is protected by the Second Amendment and further, “is incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and applies to the states”, and
WHEREAS, many of the residents of the Village of Norwood, St. Lawrence County, have expressed their displeasure not only with the provisions of the NY SAFE Act itself, but also the manner and method used to bring it to the floor and vote it into law, and
WHEREAS, using a message of necessity to bring forth and enact a law that has dozens of sections and changes in current laws, but only three of which take effect immediately, negates the argument that the speed with which this bill was brought forward was necessary, and
WHEREAS, the sheer size of the bill, the extent of the many new changes it brings and the very short time that the bill was made available to the New York State Senate and Assembly for review, effectively precluded discussion and debate on the provisions set forth in the bill, preventing the mature development of arguments, both for and against, and
WHEREAS, in an attempt to bring forth meaningful solutions for dealing with or preventing gun violence, this legislation and the majority of its provisions affect law abiding gun owners in negative and unnecessary ways and they were not given the opportunity to express their views or otherwise comment on the bill, and
WHEREAS, while there are provisions of the bill that have merit, for example, increased penalty for killing emergency responders, NICS checks for private sales of firearms, safe storage provisions, mental health record review, and increased penalties for the illegal use of a weapon, other provisions of the law, which run roughshod over second amendment rights, must be reconsidered and a new law should be introduced in a transparent manner, and it must be given the time necessary to review its provisions, engage in meaningful and constructive debate and allow public review, comment and input relative to the content of the bill, and
WHEREAS, the New York SAFE Act, as passed, will require County Clerks to carry out several provisions of the law but fails to address the responsibility for funding those additional duties, thus inflicting another unfunded mandate on already cash strapped counties,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees of the Village of Norwood joins with the many other government entities in opposing those portions of the NY SAFE Act which infringe upon the rights of lawful gun owners and does little to address the underlying issues that confront our society as a whole, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Village Board strongly encourages the members of the New York State Legislature to bring forth a bill that addresses the real problems confronted by today’s society and not jeopardize the rights of law abiding citizens, and allow time for public comment, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this resolution be sent Governor Andrew Cuomo, Senator Patty Ritchie, Senator Joseph Griffo, Senator Elizabeth O’C. Little, Assemblyman Kenneth Blankenbush, Assemblywoman Addie Russell, Assemblyman Marc Butler, and Assemblywoman Janet Duprey.
Adopted on motion made by Trustee Jim Besaw, seconded by Trustee Timothy Levison; Ayes 3, Nays 0, Absent 1.
I certify this to be a true copy of the resolution adopted at the regular Village Board meeting held April 15, 2013 on file with this office.
Susan Bartlett, Village Clerk
4/19/2013